Salta al contenuto principale

Territori Aperti Toolkit

Overview

The Territori Aperti Disaster Preparedness Toolkit is a dynamic tool that capitalises on already-implemented experiences to provide recommendations and procedures for public bodies/institutions and citizens, aiming to strengthen disaster prevention, make post-disaster actions more effective and structured, improve disaster response, reduce critical issues across all phases, and help avoid repeating past mistakes.

    Country
    Italy
    Geolocation

    Territori Aperti Toolkit

    Contributor
    ISIG
    Summary Description

    The Territori Aperti Disaster Preparedness Toolkit is a dynamic tool that gathers existing experiences and transforms them into useful recommendations and procedures for public bodies and citizens.
    It stems from the need to map critical issues in disaster management and highlight good and bad practices to improve prevention, response, and reconstruction. It is structured into sheets with standard fields, practical examples, and focuses on three phases: emergency, post-emergency, and reconstruction. It integrates a digital system (Gateway/Catalogue) and extensive use of data and GIS tools to support planning and governance.

    Context & Background

    The Toolkit was created from the need for an instrument able to map critical aspects of disaster management and to collect good and bad practices so that future similar situations can be handled better.

    Problem Addressed

    Lack of a structured, reusable way to capture lessons learned, translate them into practical guidance, and support both immediate post-disaster decision-making and pre-disaster planning.

    Vulnerable Groups

    Information on it is not available.

    Governance

    The document highlights a governance approach based on multi-level / multi-sector coordination (civil protection planning coordinated with other territorial strategic planning) and the need for shared knowledge and co-planning rather than rigid sectoral planning.

    Emergency Preparedness

    The Toolkit is positioned for pre-disaster planning and preparedness (Pre-Disaster Recovery Planning and pre-disaster planning actions), rather than only ad-hoc response.

    Infrastructure Readiness

    The Territori Aperti documentation/research setup includes: a Gateway (open research infrastructure) with a Catalogue of datasets and methods for analysis (e.g., emergency planning optimisation, knowledge to guide reconstruction), connected to the European research infrastructure SoBigData; a results dissemination site with modules for training, documentation, and the Toolkit itself.

    Purpose of Engagement

    The Toolkit promotes information-sharing and stronger interaction between public administration and citizens, so that knowledge is not restricted to officials and the population can participate more consciously in planning choices. (The text does not explicitly label the engagement as “consultation” or “partnerships,” but it clearly pushes beyond one-way communication). To enable shared territorial knowledge and allow the population to participate in planning decisions with awareness, through broader access to data, analysis, and governance strategies.

    Methods of Engagement

    Information on it is not available (beyond the general approach of sharing information/data and making it available for consultation/download).

    Degree of Influence & Decision-Making

    Information on it is not available.

    Capacity-Building & Long-Term Empowerment

    The Toolkit contributes to capacity building by offering a structured framework of recommendations, procedures, and lessons learned (good/bad practices) that can be reused by public bodies and citizens to improve prevention, response, and reconstruction.
    Long-term empowerment is supported by the creation of a "Knowledge System" and the use of digital/data tools (including GIS) to make territorial knowledge more accessible and shared, promoting more informed decisions over time.

    Key Features & Innovations
    • A structured, standardised “sheet” format with predefined fields, recommendations (including success measures), and real-world “in practice” experiences across emergency / post-emergency / reconstruction phases.
    • Emphasis on GIS-oriented tools, correct data collection/integration, and making local data available at broader scales.
    • Integration potential with a research catalogue connected to SoBigData for broader visibility and reuse. 
    Language(s)

    Italian; English

    Implementing Organisation(s)

    Among the actors cited in the Toolkit's experiences, the Abruzzo Region Civil Protection Office stands out, in collaboration with the University of L'Aquila for civil protection/DRM planning activities and the development of a "Knowledge System" and digital platform (SIM) to support the Regional Plan.
    The Abruzzo Region appears as an entity connected to territorial knowledge tools (e.g., CLeP) based on multidisciplinary indicators and shared database data to support planning.
    The University of L'Aquila also serves as a research/documentation provider for pre-disaster planning and solutions in the post-emergency/reconstruction phase.

    Experience of the Implementing Organisation in DRRM

    In the experiences reported in the Toolkit, the implementing organization (e.g., the Abruzzo Region Civil Protection Department, also in collaboration with the University of L'Aquila) demonstrates experience in Disaster Risk Management, especially in civil protection planning and in the development/use of a "Knowledge System" and a digital platform (SIM) to support analysis, risk governance, and integration with other territorial planning tools.

    Actors Involved

    Examples of actors explicitly mentioned in the Toolkit’s documented experiences include Università degli Studi dell’Aquila, Regione Abruzzo, and Protezione Civile Regione Abruzzo (with the University), as well as broader references to public administrations and citizens.

    Implementation Steps
    • Collect and map critical aspects of disaster management; identify good/bad practices.
    • Structure content into sheets with predefined fields + recommendations + “in practice” experiences (with sources).
    • Maintain the Toolkit through ongoing implementation and work toward better codification and integration into the Catalogue.
    Resources Required

    Information on it is not available.

    Timeframe & Phases

    The Toolkit is described as constantly being implemented. It also organises content by three operational phases: Emergency, Post-emergency, and Reconstruction.

    Lessons Learned from Implementation

    The Toolkit notes that some of its contents may later populate the Catalogue, becoming a resource for other researchers, and that future work includes improving the codification system and how sheet information should be shaped to be effectively inserted and used in the Catalog.

    Challenges & Adaptive Strategies

    A key challenge identified is that Italian planning systems are often rigid and stable, whereas the proposed approach requires flexibility and dynamism; the Toolkit recommends stronger data integration, shared databases, and GIS-oriented tools to support improved governance and planning.

    Risk & Mitigation Plan

    Information on it is not available.

    Sustainability Model

    The Toolkit does not describe an "operational" sustainability model (e.g., governance, budget, ownership, maintenance), but sustainability is primarily conceived as a structured and reusable knowledge management, given that the Toolkit is constantly being implemented and some content is designed to also feed the Catalog/Gateway. In addition, the default fields for the cards include "SDG Codes," which classifies each card according to the 17 SDGs of the UN 2030 Agenda (so you can enter the SDG codes directly there, card by card).

    Scalability & Adaptability

    The Toolkit is designed to be replicable in different contexts because it capitalizes on experiences already implemented and translates them into useful recommendations/procedures for managing similar situations in the future, reducing the risk of repeating errors.
    The standardized tab structure (predefined fields + recommendations + case studies) facilitates adaptation: relevant tabs can be selected and updated with local data/assets.
    However, an operational scaling plan (replication criteria, costs, timelines, governance for adoption) is not described.

    Technology & Innovation

    Technology is central: GIS-oriented approaches, structured data collection/integration, a digital knowledge infrastructure (Gateway + Catalogue), and planned integration/visibility via SoBigData.

    Financial & Logistical Sustainability - Direct Costs

    INFO NOT AVAILABLE

    Financial & Logistical Sustainability - Operational Costs

    Information on it is not available.

    Lessons Learned

    The Toolkit notes that some of its contents may later populate the Catalogue, becoming a resource for other researchers, and that future work includes improving the codification system and how sheet information should be shaped to be effectively inserted and used in the Catalogue.