Skip to main content

MAG-DER

Overview

MAG-DER (Mahalle Afet Gönüllüleri Derneği) is a legally established association (established 2017) that aims to expand and sustain a neighbourhood-based disaster volunteer model (MAG) across Türkiye. It focuses on developing local capacity so residents—framed as “first responders”—can reduce disaster impacts through training, organisation, equipment, and procedures designed to work in harmony with Türkiye’s disaster management legislation.

    Map
    Country
    Türkiye
    Geolocation

    MAG-DER

    Contributor
    ISIG
    Summary Description

    MAG-DER coordinates a standardised neighbourhood disaster volunteer model built on a 36-hour training programme (theory and fieldwork), volunteer team organisation, and “Neighbourhood Disaster Support Centers” (equipment containers) linked via radio to provincial crisis structures, with volunteer-led maintenance and periodic checks.

    The main aim is to create a local sustainable network with neighborhood-based structures that will enable civil society to cope with disasters against all possible disasters that may occur in Turkey, carrying out activities that ensure that residents of the neighborhood become prepared first responders in disasters.

    Context & Background

    MAG-DER frames the MAG model as emerging in the aftermath of the 1999 Marmara earthquakes, with the model introduced by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and developed with participation of multiple institutions and individuals. Implementation happened since 2004 under a protocol with the Istanbul Governorate, and later organisational shifts (SDC withdrawal; volunteer groups formalising into associations; and consolidation under MAG-DER in 2017).

    Problem Addressed

    MAG-DER’s posits that state institutions cannot manage disasters alone, and that plans excluding public participation are not functional; therefore the solution is to build local, sustainable, neighbourhood-based volunteer capacity so residents (first responders) can reduce disaster damages through preparedness, organisation, and trained response.

    Vulnerable Groups

    No explicit mention of vulnerable groups

    Governance

    Neighborhood voluneer teams cooperate with government systems such as the Provincial Crisis Center, the Istanbul Governorate and AFAD, the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency.

    Emergency Preparedness

    The model is built to operate within existing disaster management legislation and crisis structures, and includes training, exercises, evaluation, and radio links to crisis centres.

    Infrastructure Readiness

    The model includes designated Neighbourhood Disaster Support Centers (equipment containers), team equipment (generators, cutting tools, radios, etc.), and communications links to crisis centres, plus periodic maintenance systems.

    Purpose of Engagement

    The purpose of engagement is to build first response capacity among neighborhood residents and reduce vulnerability; sustain a local network of volunteers and strengthen public participation in disaster management.

    Methods of Engagement

    Methods include a standardised 36-hour training, including both theory and field activities, exercises, exams and a certificate ceremony. Additionally, the level of knowledge and awareness at the local level is measured before and after MAG training and its contribution to society is determined. In addition, surveys are carried out to all segments of society for promotion, dissemination and awareness purposes.

    Degree of Influence & Decision-Making

    The standardised model is not aimed at decision-making:  volunteers hold operational responsibility for local centre/equipment maintenance and participate as organised neighbourhood responders

    Capacity-Building & Long-Term Empowerment

    Experts and academic instructors train neighborhood residents as first responders in a way which increases local resilience and facilitates community responses in the long term. The network of volunteers is able to strengthen social capital, collective preparedness and operational competences.

    Key Features & Innovations

    The key innovations are represented by both infrastructural and social elements:

    • a standardised and tested training program
    • infrastructures of "Neighborhood Disaster Support Centers"
    • volunteer-run periodic maintenance system for the infrastructure
    • explicit mention to collaboration with staff, infrastructure and protocols of emergency responses at the institutional level
    Language(s)

    Turkish

    Implementing Organisation(s)

    MAG-DER (Mahalle Afet Gönüllüleri Derneği)

    Experience of the Implementing Organisation in DRRM

    The activity has been ongoing since the post-1999 earthquake development; implementation since 2004 under protocol with Istanbul Governorate; training delivered by expert/academic instructors.

    Actors Involved

    Local volunteers, residents, Provincial Crisis Center, Istanbul Governorate Protocol, AFAD (Turkish Emergency Management).

    Implementation Steps

    The implementation of the framework is structured along these phases:

    • Volunteer recruitment;
    • Delivery of the 36-hour training programme;
    • Equipping of volunteers and teams;
    • Establishing a Neighborhood Disaster Support Center
    • Setting up VHF radio communication
    • Periodic maintenance and upkeep by volunteers
    Resources Required

    No consolidated budget costs are declared, but human resources are involved for the training and resources are needed to equip local communities, volunteers and the Neighborhood Disaster Support Center. 

    Timeframe & Phases

    Recruitment, delivery of structured modules, exercises, evaluation and exams, readiness maintenance routines.

    Lessons Learned from Implementation

    Disaster management requires public participation, which needs however to be integrated through training and embeddedness in neighborhood infrastructures.

    Challenges & Adaptive Strategies

    Among the challenges, continuity among once-trained communities and of the volunteer network emerges as the most relevant. Maintaining operational readiness is another challenge, followed by ensuring a scientific approach in the training delivered through a volunteer-run association.

    Risk & Mitigation Plan

    The creation of an association was conceived to contrast withdrawal.
    Periodic upkeep and maintenance from the part of volunteers prevents obsolescence of the infrastructure of Neighborhood Centers.
    The involvement of academic and experts in the training ensures the scientific robustness of the approach.

    Sustainability Model

    The establishment of a formal organization ensures continuity and the possibility of spreading the model across diverse areas, cities and regions in Turkey; alongside the association, the standardised training package ensures sustainability in knowledge transfer among volunteers. The periodic volunteer-run maintenance ensures the upkeep of infrastructures and equipment.

    Scalability & Adaptability

    MAG-DER’s stated vision is to organise MAGs nationwide and create a broader federation/confederation-type structure; it also lists ongoing organisational activity in multiple provinces (e.g., Istanbul, Muğla, Gelibolu, Ankara, Trabzon, Eskişehir). It has, in fact, been scaled across 4 provinces, more than a hundred neighborhoods and 32.000 volunteers.

    Technology & Innovation

    VHF radio connectivity between neighborhood support centers and provincial crisis centers, as well as radios, lighting, cutting tools and other equipment provided for training and exercises.

    Financial & Logistical Sustainability - Direct Costs

    Though not explicitly declared, the direct costs will concern human resources involved in the training, venue hiring and the setup of the Neighborhood centers.

    Financial & Logistical Sustainability - Operational Costs

    Though not explicitly declared, the operational costs will concern the training materials and equipment maintenance.